IT Staff Augmentation: Mistakes To Avoid While Hiring Developers

Many organizations have found their way to success through Staff Augmentation. Either by hiring entire teams or augmenting their existing in-house capabilities.

But what is the premise behind Staff Augmentation’s success?
It cannot be a fluke since the arrangement is often replicated worldwide.
It cannot be a fad since Staff augmentation is service-oriented – rather than based on the scope of a product – and often is associated with actual costs and RoI.

So what is it?
The no-string arrangement wherein payment/rewards are associated with performance and delivery – and not obligatory accounts.

We, however, are bringing another take to it.
Success – and how you can assure it.
Perhaps by avoiding a few grave mistakes.

Whether you are a newbie to the staff augmentation service or have already hired and worked with a team, knowing the common mistakes and how to avoid them is beneficial.

Here are five common Staff Augmentation mistakes that you must avoid while choosing the right service partner;

5 Common Staff Augmentation Mistakes

Turning a blind eye to an organization’s culture

Outsourcing implies that the organization will work with people from different countries, so it is important to remember that cultural differences will play an important role. Organizations that don’t consider this factor harm themselves in the long run.

To avoid this mistake, you should know that cultural differences might seem sensible and should be carefully analyzed. In most cases, training on the subject would be required so that it can fit both parties and work adequately for the project.

Lack of research in the market

Reviewing and researching the market includes checking the experience, comments, ratings, and case studies offered by different staff augmentation companies. For instance, Clutch is one such platform that provides complete information that can be found to evaluate a potential partner.

Source: sfappworks.com

To avoid making the mistake of lack of research, it is essential that the organization you choose partners with some good B2B platforms that will allow you to check all the experiences.

On the other hand, if you do not find reviews and ratings about the company, it would imply that they might not have the right teams or are not too experienced in the field in the first place.

I am not checking the requirements.

Lack of a clear vision about what you require and not presenting the correct expectations can result in a misunderstanding.

The scope and mapping would be futile – since the project would always return to its bare essentials. Not to mention lost time, effort, and money.

To manage this grave error, it is recommended that you observe the internal team, their roles, and responsibilities, and afterward analyze what you expect from the augmented and remote unit.

A complete and precise description of the project idea can be prepared to look for little details. This way, you can present the facts in a better manner and hire qualified developers so that you can get the results you want.

Thinking that you can move without a project manager

Usually, start-ups and companies do not have much experience in staff augmentation and oversee the requirement of a manager solely responsible for communication between developers’ teams and clients.

A project manager is usually in charge of verifying the process and creating tasks for the entire team.

To avoid this mistake, it should be understood that proper communication allows for the project to be safe, and having a project manager in place would make the processes easier.

Also, you’d have a singular PoC that’d act as a conduit for data, updates, and information.

Here’s a consideration for you – many organizations believe that a project manager will replace the IT specialist, and they can hire one for two, but that is different.

Read More: IT Staff Augmentation – The Challenges And The Solutions

Choosing the suitable outsourcing model

Many organizations rush and go for an approach that looks simple, and looking into the current state of the market, one can analyze that there can be several confusion. Rushing to hire the right outsourcing team can prevent organizations from knowing the best model suited to their needs.

Hence, you must review the partners’ different engagement models before deciding.

A cloud employee.
Or an entire team.
Understand the scope of work, the operational tenets, and the payments with each engagement model.
Also, leave some wiggle room for team scaling and churning as you need.

Whether you decide to have a dedicated team or augment the already available staff, the right thing to do would be to look for items that are missing so that you avoid money and time loss to get better results.

Moving Forward

The mistakes that are mentioned above are the common mistakes that most organizations tend to make and repeat. The above tips can help you understand the inconveniences you might encounter while augmenting your staff and hiring developers.

You can take all the time to review the aspects we mentioned and what is essential for making the right decision. Organizations must also be aware of these mistakes and should understand that they require a dedicated team to reduce time and effort.

Get dedicated staff augmentation services @Netsmartz,

At Netsmartz, we offer managed services that include hiring all the additional resources at no cost for your project. Our experienced software developers, testers, architects, and designers can help you minimize risks, streamline engineering and enhance the delivery process for the next project.

We ensure quality deliverables, ease of onboarding, more innovative and seamless processes, + Lower overall TCO.